A Godless Existence (Μια Άθεη Ύπαρξη)
-From the Meletic Scrolls.
In Meleticism, we begin with the premise that being or existence itself is not contingent on a god, nor is it something that requires a divine being for its explanation or unfolding. Instead, being is an independent and self-sustaining process that operates through its inherent laws, principles and natural flows. It is like a river that flows effortlessly, nourishing all it touches, without needing a divine dam to contain it. A god, within this structure is irrelevant to the reality of existence and ultimately unnecessary for the cosmos, nature or universal truth. Existence continues without the need for a god, and it unfolds according to natural processes that are defined by the Logos and the Nous.
Meleticism as a philosophy affirms that being itself is the foundation of reality, existing independently of any sacred will. The cosmos operates according to its own intrinsic laws, not because of divine intervention, but because of the natural elements of matter, energy and the unfolding of existence. Stars burn, life evolves and the universe expands without the need for an overseeing god or divine figure. A god is not needed to explain the functioning of nature or the operations of the cosmos. The universe exists on its own, free from the necessity of any divine force impelled.
A god within religion is a creator or sustainer of being, but a god becomes an idea that emerges from within being itself. How could he exist within being? In a sense, it is a human construct that seeks to elucidate the vastness of existence, the complexity of the material world and the nature of life and death in accordance to a creator god. What should be construed is that a god is not necessary for the unfolding of being; instead, it is a reflection of the human need for answers to the unrevealing mysteries of life through acts of faith or mysticism.
The irrelevance of a god in the unfolding of existence is emphasised in Meleticism by understanding that the cosmos would continue to unfold regardless of divine intervention. The laws of physics, the processes of the Logos, the Nous, and the evolution of life do not require divine intervention; rather, they are a result of natural forces at work. The same can be said for the cosmos. The formation of stars, the expansion of galaxies and the movement of celestial bodies all occur through natural processes governed by physical laws. These processes operate according to their own inherent principles, which are independent of any divine force or will.
Moreover, a god does not provide the foundation of existence; being itself does. The principle of (To Ένa) the One, represents the ultimate unity from which all things arise. It is impersonal and does not create or govern existence; instead, it serves as the unifying force behind all things. To Ena exists independently of a god, and the cosmos is a manifestation of this unity. Thus, a god is not a necessary force for the unfolding of the universe; the universe evolves naturally from the unity of being.
The irrelevance of a god is particularly apparent when we consider the functioning of life and the universe. Life on Earth has evolved over countless centuries, through the process of its evolution shaped by environmental factors. This process does not require divine intervention; rather, it is a result of natural forces at work. The same can be said for the cosmos: the formation of stars, the expansion of galaxies, and the movement of celestial bodies all occur through natural forces and principles that have nothing to do with a divine plan or intervention. Life continues to evolve, and the universe continues to expand, independent of any divine being.
Moreover, the idea that being is necessary for a god brings us to the realisation that a god cannot exist in the absence of being. A god finds its meaning and significance only within the context of existence. It is not the cause of existence, but one of the countless interpretations of existence. Without being, there would be no concept of a god; no consciousness would be present to formulate or conceptualise its divine nature. In this sense, being is necessary for a god, as it is only through being that a god could be conceived in the first place.
The idea of a god, then, arises as a human concept within being, which is a product and display of our consciousness and our search for actual meaning. A god is conceived as a way for individuals to understand their place in the universe, to answer questions about life, death and morality, and to seek comfort in times of uncertainty. This need for a god does not imply its necessity for the reality of existence. Being continues whether or not a god is conceived or believed in. A god is not a necessary component of the universe or of life; it is a subjective concept that exists in the minds of those people who seek to find some meaning and purpose beyond the natural world.
This perspective allows for the irrelevance of a god in the sense that the cosmos functions independently of any divine influence. Life continues to evolve, the universe continues to expand, and natural forces continue to shape reality, all without the need for a divine being. A god, therefore, is not necessary to the fundamental functions of reality. It is a subjective concept that exists within the minds of those who seek to find spiritual meaning and purpose in the face of the vastness and mystery of universal existence.
In Meleticism, we also understand that a god is unnecessary for a meaningful existence. Whilst the concept of a god has played a significant role in human history and continues to be important for many individuals, it is not the only path to understanding or to finding hidden meaning in life. Meaning can be found within existence itself, through contemplation, self-awareness and engagement with the world. Being itself provides the basis for meaning and purpose, independent of any divine influence. The universe unfolds according to its own established principles, and it is through conscious reflection on being and its processes that one finds meaning, not through the existence of a god, but in the realisation of cosmic unity.
The notion that existence can be meaningful without a god is foundational in Meleticism. It is not the existence of a divine being that gives meaning to life; rather, it is the awareness and conscious engagement with being that brings meaning. By embracing the natural world and the principles that govern it, one can cultivate a deeper understanding of existence, its impermanence and its beauty. This engagement leads to a life of self-awareness, wisdom and growth, grounded in the recognition that being itself is sufficient for understanding the nature of reality.
Being is not contingent upon a god, nor is a god necessary for existence to unfold. The cosmos, nature and the flow of life continue independently of any divine intervention. A god is not the creator or sustainer of being; rather, being provides the context in which the idea of a god can emerge. A god as conceived by humans or religious books is irrelevant to the fundamental processes of existence. It is the result of human yearning, a need to interpret and find meaning in the vastness of being that occupies life.
Believes of a god say that see a god not with their eyes, but with their hearts. Then, what is there of the truth, if one is blinded by devotion than by reason? It is like walking in the greener pastures, until one reaches the abundance of the ocean. In that moment, one realises he has finally seen the truth. A truth that reminds us existence is universal and not reduced to a godlike vision of a heaven.
Being is the foundation of reality, and it is within being that a god may emerge as a human construct, but a god is not necessary for the unfolding of existence, nor is it the viable cause of life. Being itself provides all that is needed for reality to exist, and the idea of a god becomes relevant only when there is yearning to seek him in need. Therefore, a god is unnecessary for the explanation of the cosmos and for a meaningful existence. Being, in its essence, is sufficient. To Ena is the unfolding and realisation of being. Faith does not answer the question of existence. Instead, it is fate that reveals itself through universal existence, whence originates from To Ena.
For more features, such as favoriting, recommending, and reviewing, please go to the full version of this story.