The Logos: The Meletic Testament (Chapter 81 The Apologia)

📜 Chapter 81: The Apologia

I. On Refusal

I Heromenes have refused many things in my life that are not of my persuasion. I have refused the assembly’s invitation to speak for profit. I have refused the Pagan priest’s blessing for tradition. I have refused the bread offered in rituals of the Christians, the wine poured in praise of gods I do not see or believe in eternal salvation. These refusals are not acts of rebellion or denial. They are acts of clarity and wisdom that define my philosophy.

The world around me is stirred with belief. The temples still echo with hymns to Apollo and Dionysus, even though their statues gather dust. The Roman rule persists as does Christian fervour, promising an afterlife to those people who kneel before their god. I do not kneel. I do not sing. I do not believe. Instead, I stand upright, and follow the path of To Ena.

This refusal is not bitterness. I do not dislike the Pagan gods. I have outgrown them. I do not mock the Christians out of ignorance. I have discovered another path. I do not seek to unmake what others find sacred. I simply do not share the belief to belong to their traditions or church.

I have walked the hills of Attica at dawn, when the sky is pale. I have watched the olive trees sway without instruction, the sea breathe against the shore without command upon the waves. I have seen the world move in the rhythm of the Logos, not in the obedience of divine will. And I have learnt that the truth does not shout—it whispers its natural revelations.

The myths of our ancestors are beautiful. I do not deny their traditions. I have read the tragedies, the poetry, the epics and the hymns of the past. I have admired the cleverness of Hermes, the wrath of Poseidon, the sorrow of Demeter, but admiration is not belief or a path to live. I do not build my life upon stories, no matter how artful or inspiring they may be in their essence.

The Christians speak of original sin and redemption, of a god who died and rose again, who they call Jesus. They speak with urgency, with certainty and with trembling joy. I do not share their urgency. I do not feel their certainty. I do not share elation for their Jesus. They say that he is the Logos, but I know instead that he is nothing more than a part of the Logos, just as I am too and others.

They ask me: what do you believe in, then? If not the gods, if not the Christ, then what?

I tell them that I believe in wisdom. I believe in clarity. I believe in the body, in the mind, in the soul, in the patterns that emerge when one listens without expectation. I believe in the shape of things as they are formed by the Nous—not as they are imagined, not as they are promised. I believe in the order of the Logos that governs the cosmos, and I believe that I am not a creation of a god, but instead, a breath of universal existence that derived from To Ena, the One.

My refusal is not an emptiness. It is a unique space. In that space, I have found deep thought. In that space, I have found inner peace.

I do not refuse because I am proud. I refuse because I am awakened. I do not speak in the assembly because the assembly does not listen. I do not pray because prayer presumes a listener. I do not follow them, because I do not walk the same path of theirs—only the terrain.

Some call me a blasphemer. They say I place myself above tradition, above community, above faith, but I do not place myself above anything. I simply stand beside it, and choose not to enter their path. For I have found a path greater than theirs.

I have watched the festivals from a distance. I have heard the chants, seen the dances, smelled the incense, and heard their sermons. But I have felt nothing. Not disdain. Not awe. Only observation that does not fulfil my soul inside of me.

There is a kind of freedom in refusal. Not the freedom of defiance, but the freedom experienced in awareness. When one stops chasing meaning, one begins to notice it. Not in actual symbols, but in certain patterns. Not in fleeting prophecy, but in lasting presence that comes with awareness.

I do not ask others to refuse. I do not preach Meleticism. I do not gather disciples or apostles. I do not write divine commandments or scriptures. I write only what I see, and what I have lived and shared with others through my vision and scrolls.

Verily, if this makes me a stranger in my own city, so be it. I would rather be a stranger with clarity than a citizen with confusion, who does not walk in my footsteps and does not understand the way of the truth.

I do not refuse the world. I refuse the darkness that obscures it. I am a Meletic—not a Christian or Pagan in my belief.

II. On Life

Life is not a question to be answered. It is a movement to be joined and episodes to be written. We are the embodiment of its living breath, through the presence of the soul.

I do not claim to know everything about life. I claim only to witness it. To observe its patterns, its contradictions, its quiet insistence. Life does not ask for belief—it asks instead for presence.

The priests speak of life as a gift from the Pagan gods. The philosophers speak of it as a problem to solve. The Christians speak of life as a need for eternal salvation. The poets call it a tragedy, a comedy, a dream. I call it a rhythm. Not because it is simple, but because it is continuous in its process and revelation.

Life is the way the olive tree bends in the wind but does not break. It is the way the child learns to speak—not by instruction, but by imitation. It is the way the body heals itself, slowly, without any ceremony to perform.

I do not seek to conquer life. I seek to dwell with it and understand its function. By understanding life, I become closer to the truth and to surrounding world that is manifested through the Logos and the Nous.

There are those people who live as if life was a contest. They measure, compare and accumulate. They chase permanence in a world that offers only change through the Logos, but life is not a ledger. It is not a monument. It is a current of the Nous.

To live well is not to dominate the self. It is to discern the important of the self. To notice the shape of existential things. To move with care. To speak with intention. To rest without any measure of unnecessary guilt.

I have lived many years. I have seen empires rise and fall. I have seen doctrines replace doctrines, each claiming finality, but life continues, indifferent to proclamation.

The city changes. The gods change. Even the stars shift, but life remains—quiet, persistent and ungoverned in its nature.

I do not pray. I do not kneel. I do not plead. I listen instead to the awareness of my soul as it reveals itself to me. For in the soul, I understand the actual meaning of the truth.

Life does not reward obedience. It rewards attention to its presence. It does not give willing to those people who expect rewards, because they are owed these rewards. Instead, it rewards those people who have earned those rewards.

There is wisdom in the way the sparrow builds its nest. Not from ideas, but from instinct. There is wisdom in the way the river carves the stone—not with force, but with patience. There is wisdom in the way the old man walks—slowly, deliberately, without apology.

I do not envy the young. I do not mourn the past. I do not fear the future. I live the present; for it is all that I know and am guaranteed in life.

Not perfectly. Not heroically, but attentively. I have realised for some time now that my consciousness guides my soul and self.

Life is not a performance. It is not a mere test. It is not a punishment. It is a condition. A state of being. A series of moments, each asking only to be noticed.

I have suffered. I have rejoiced. I have been lost. I have been found. And through it all, life has remained—not as a holy doctrine, but as a loyal companion.

Meleticism teaches no divine commandments. It offers no eternal salvation. It offers only a way of seeing. A way of being. A way of living without the illusion of divinity. It is the natural understanding of the unfolding of life, through the Logos, the Nous and To Ena.

I do not reject meaning. I reject the compulsion to invent it for the purpose of indoctrination and powerful greed.

Life is not meaningless. It is unforced. It is when we imposed upon life that we fail to understand its genuine meaning.

To live is to participate. To engage. To respond. Not with certainty, but with sincerity. A sincerity that reflects our inner self and soul.

I do not ask what life wants from me. I ask what I can offer to it, whilst I am alive.

A quiet mind. A steady hand. A clear gaze.

This is my practice. This is my philosophy. This is my life.

III. On the City

I was born in Athens, even though I no longer belong to its enthusiasm. It belongs to me, only in the act remembrance.

The city I knew is not the city I walk through now. The stones remain, but the influence has shifted. The gods have been replaced with a new god, the rituals rewritten, the voices grown louder but less clear.

Once, the city was an intellectual conversation. Now, it is an imposing proclamation.

I do not mourn the past. I mourn the loss of listening. It is in that listening that men have forsaken the fundamental essence of philosophy.

The agora used to hum with questions. Now it groans with uncertainty. The streets echo with sermons, the people with slogans. Everyone speaks in riddles. Few understand them.

I walk the same paths I walked as a young boy. The olive trees still lean towards the sun. The Acropolis still casts its shadow, but the rhythm is broken. The city stumbles.

Rome has left its mark—not just in stone, but in thought. Authority has replaced enquiry. Uniformity has replaced nuance. The city wears its obedience like a slave.

And now the Christians rise—not with swords, but with faith. They do not listen. They ignore. They do not debate. They declare their god is the only path to salvation, but they fail to realise that salvation is but a thing that men yearn than fulfil.

I have watched the temples emptied, the statues defaced, the names forgotten. Not because they were wrong, but because they were inconvenient.

The city forgets its philosophers. That is its greatest danger. I have dreamt many times that the city will fall in to the hands of the zealots.

Forgetting is not the absence of memory. It is the refusal to remember. And to not remember is to condemn philosophy to the pages of oblivion.

I do not defend the old gods. I do not defend the new one. I defend the act of remembering, when philosophy was taught to every Greek who listened.

Athens was once a place of tension—between reason and myth, between freedom and order. That tension was its vitality. Now it seeks to be imposed, and in doing so, it loses its pulse.

I do not ask the city to return to what it was. I ask it to remember what it is, when men of philosophy teach the exploration of the mind and wisdom through knowledge.

A city is not its walls. It is not its laws. It is not its leaders. It is its essence. And essence cannot be legislated.

I have seen the philosophers retreat into silence. I have seen the artists flee to the countryside. I have seen the curious become more cautious in their words.

The city punishes ambiguity. It rewards allegiance. The men of greed and power become less humane and greedier in their actions and proclamations.

But life is ambiguous. Thought is ambiguous. The truth is rarely own. It is expressed and lived through the way of the truth.

I remain in Athens not out of loyalty, but out of necessity. The city is my teacher, even in its evident decline.

I learn from its bustle. I learn from its forgetting. I learn from its contradictions.

Meleticism does not seek religious purity. It seeks clarity. And clarity often comes from contrast.

The city is no longer clear, but it is still present in my thoughs and observations.

I walk. I observe. I listen. Not to the proclamations, but to the spaces between them that are noticeable.

A cracked column. A faded inscription. A child asking a question no one can answer with words.

These are the city’s truths. Not the ones carved in marble, but the ones whispered in passing.

I do not expect the city to change. I expect myself to remain attentive and realise that I am enlightened by To Ena.

This is my resistance. This is my presence. This is my Athens. This is the face of Meleticism.

IV. On Meleticism

I did not invent Meleticism. I observed it as a student, and was taught by my teacher Asterion, who was the last sage of his kind. It was he, who passed his knowledge unto me, and inspired me to write the logos, as a testament to his wisdom.

Meleticism was not born in a temple, nor in an academy. It emerged in the spaces between things—in the pause before speech, in the breath before action, in the silence after loss, and in philosophy.

Meleticism is not a religion. It is not a rebellion. It is a philosophy pure in its teaching and learning. It is not adulterated by the influence of religious scribes.

The word itself—melete in Greek—means attention, care, practice. It is the act of tending to what is present. Not with urgency, but with clarity.

I do not offer divine commandments. I offer wise questions that guide me in my journey of life afterwards.

What is the shape of this moment? What is the rhythm of this thought? What is the weight of this silence?

Meleticism does not seek answers. It seeks alignment. When we are one with the cosmos, nature and reality, we are one with the Logos, the Nous and To Ena.

There are no sacred texts. No rituals. No hierarchy. Only the practice of recognising the way of the truth.

I have been called a sceptic or a fool. I am aware of all titles, but I claim none. My wisdom is one that comes from the fountain of knowledge that I drink from.

Meleticism is not a path to an afterlife. It is a way of being that guides us through the way of the truth and enlightenment. Eventually, we reach the path towards To Ena.

The gods demand belief. The philosophers demand reason. Meleticism demands nothing. It reveals itself through our awareness.

To attend is to live without illusion. To live without illusion is to live without fear. Fear can only lead us astray from rationality. We must overcome our fear, by erasing the ilusion of fear.

I do not call myself a sage or a prophet. I reject the compulsion to choose between them. I much prefer to be known, as a seeker of the truth and the guardian of Meleticism.

Meleticism is not a divine path. It is a deeper one, which leads towards To Ena, the One.

It does not reconcile opposites. It listens to them. When we understand the foundation of Meleticism, then we can practise its philosophy.

I have practiced Meleticism daily. Not by preaching, but by observing. Not by converting, but by conversing.

Those people who ask what Meleticism teaches miss the point. It does not merely teach. It reveals.

It reveals the rhythm of thought. The cadence of emotion. The architecture of awareness.

Meleticism is not imposing. It is natural. It has no allegiance to a god or the need for its worship.

To live Meletically is to move with intention. To speak with care. To rest without guilt or bitterness.

It is not a rejection of structure. It is a refinement of it. What we refined is our virtues, our good deeds, our character and the self.

I do not ask others to follow Meleticism. I ask them to notice their own thoughts and consciousness.

If they find resonance, they are already practicing the discipline of meditation and contemplation.

Meleticism is not a group of people like a church is to the Christians. Instead, it is a path taken that enlightens one.

It does not offer eternal salvation in return. Instead, it offers great clarity.

I have written these words not to define Meleticism, but to reflect it as it truly should be defined in principle and in practice.

If they seem vague, it is because clarity cannot be forced. If they seem simple, it is because the truth often is.

Meleticism is not mine. It is not yours. It is not ours. It belongs to all existential things of life.

This is my genuine practice. This is my philosophy. This is Meleticism.

V. On Legacy

I do not wish to be remembered. I wish to be understood—if only briefly, as an expounder of a living philosophy that I attest to its value.

Legacy is the city’s obsession. Statues, inscriptions, lineages. Names carved in marble, stories stretched into myth, but marble crumbles. Stories distort. Names are forgotten.

I have walked past the tombs of men once called great. Their faces worn away by time, their deeds debated by strangers. Is this legacy?

The Christians speak of immortality through salvation. The generals seek it through conquest after death. The priests promise it through faith. I seek none of these.

I seek only lasting presence that accompanies me in life and in the way of the truth.

Legacy is often a distraction. A performance for the future, staged in the present, but the future does not attend. It revises.

I do not write to be forgotten. I write to be remembered. Not for who I was, but for what the philosophy of my teacher and mention Asterion represented.

If these words endure, let them endure quietly. If they vanish, let them vanish without regret, but if they remain, then let them be immortalised for the generations to come to hear these words of mine professed. If this is what my legacy will be known for, then let it reach the people who discover it.

Meleticism teaches that permanence is an illusion. Virtue is not. And virtue does not linger—it fulfils one's character.

I have no disciples like the Nazarene. I have no school. I have no monument. I have only practice. Legacy asks—What will they say of me? Meleticism asks—What am I saying now?

I have seen men twist themselves into shapes they do not recognise, all for the sake of being remembered. They sacrifice sincerity for spectacle, but memory built on distortion is not honour—it is noise.

I do not fear being forgotten or misunderstood. I have learnt more than what I had known before.

If I am remembered, let it be for my awareness. Not for my conclusions, but for my questions.

I have loved. I have erred. I have listened. These are my offerings that life has witnessed of me.

The city will forget me. The world will forget me. This is not tragedy. It is natural occurrence that befalls many men.

Thus, I do not wish to be a name written in the pages of history. I wish to be a moment that stirs the minds of men.

A moment of clarity. A moment of silence. A moment of time. Above all, a lasting moment of the truth.

Legacy is not what we leave behind. It is what we experience through with our lives daily.

I have lived slowly. I have spoken carefully. I have walked deliberately. This is my legacy.

Not in mere stone to be honoured. Not in divine scripture to be praised, but in lasting memory to be fulfilled. This is the Meletic path.

If a person one day pauses to listen to the wind, and in that pause feels something shift—let that be enough.

I do not ask to be quoted. I ask to be echoed through the inspiring words of my wisdom.

This is my practice. This is my philosophy. This is my legacy. This is my testament I leave behind for those people who shall read the Meletic Testament.

0 Reviews

For more features, such as favoriting, recommending, and reviewing, please go to the full version of this story.