Please register or login to continue

Register Login

The Weight Of Choice (Το βάρος της επιλογής)
The Weight Of Choice (Το βάρος της επιλογής)

The Weight Of Choice (Το βάρος της επιλογής)

Franc68Lorient Montaner

-From The Meletic Scrolls.

In every moment of reflection, we find ourselves standing at a threshold that is a crossing between what has been and what might become in essence. This threshold is called choice. Yet the phenomenon of choice is far more than a transient moment of decision; it is an intersection of memory, causality, self-awareness and silent metaphysical forces. It bears weight, not merely for its actual consequence, but for its origin and its echo.

What is this act we call choosing? Is it an assertion of will, independent and sovereign? Or is it the unveiling of a convergence where many unseen rivers of thought, memory, conditioning and desire meet? From the Meletic standpoint, the act of choosing is not detached from the self, nor is it wholly consequential. It is a pulse within the greater pattern or a ripple of the Logos, emerging through the vessel of consciousness.

To understand choice is first to consider being. In Meleticism, we recognise the soul (psyche) as a vessel shaped by the Nous, harmonised by the Logos, and grounded in the body. The human experience is not isolated from the (To Ena) the One, but an expression of it. Every choice, then, is not random nor isolated; it is shaped by the layered textures of our existence, which are our memory, body, will and intellect.

Every decision begins not in the moment, but in the unfolding of countless moments before. The present is always conditioned. The individual who chooses does so through the inherited awareness of yesterday, the bias of upbringing, the structure of language and the present tendency of desire. Thus, a choice is not born; it emerges. It rises like a wave, shaped by winds already blowing across the vast sea of the self.

This is not to say that choice is deterministic. There is space within awareness where the self can pause, consider and redirect. The Logos does not force; it orders. Within that order is possibility. Within that possibility is ethical agency.

Then the question arises is each choice a convergence of past awareness, or a seed of future self?

In Meletic thought, it is both. We become aware of the presence through our past, and we recognise the potentiality of choice within our future. This is how we grasp the meaning of choice. We should not waste our choices or be easily influenced by materialism.

The philosopher sees clearly that nothing arises from a void. Each act of choice converges the totality of our former knowledge, our inner dialogues, our past contemplations and even the echoes of inherited consciousness. In this sense, we do not choose from blankness; instead we choose as a continuation of ourselves. The hand that lifts the tool is not just choosing to write; it is carrying forth years of silent formation.

Each choice is also a seed. A tiny act of self-becoming. For when one chooses, one affirms a direction. The soul bends slightly, aligns differently. The Logos, which governs the natural order of becoming, receives each ethical or unethical action as a real motion, shaping the soul towards its unfolding true essence (ousia).

This is crucial, because we are always in metamorphosis. The soul, though shaped is not fixed. It is capable of shaping itself through choice. Each decision is therefore a metaphysical event, not just a temporal one. It affects who we are becoming, not just what we will do.

There are causes that express desires, emotions, fears and external pressures. But there are also causes that whisper. These are the silent causes that are the layered sediment of earlier choices, unspoken beliefs, bodily memory or the state of the soul. These silent causes often move more deeply than we realise. They guide our hand before our mind fully knows it function.

In Meletic contemplation, one is called to become aware of these silent causes. To sit with them. To examine whether the act of choice is truly reflective or merely reactive. Is the choice born from clarity or from the shadows of the psyche? This question is not asked in judgement, but in freedom. To observe the silent cause is to weaken its unfreedom.

The more conscious we become, the more we are able to separate the necessary from the habitual, the meaningful from the mechanical. The Logos governs all, but it inspires alignment, not automation. To act in the Meletic sense is not to be free from all causes, but to be free within them.

Freedom, therefore, is not the absence of cause, but the conscious navigation of causes. Freedom is a more than a yearning; it is a balance of the mind, soul and body. It effects our choices.

In every choice, there is an ethical note, even if soft. Whether the action affects others or only the self, whether visible or invisible it contributes to the shaping of character. Meletic ethics teaches that virtue is cultivated not in grand decisions alone, but in the minute, nearly invisible acts; choosing to be still instead of reactive, generous instead of bitter, aware instead of distracted.

To make an ethical choice is to align with the governing logos (rationality) within the self. It is to act in accordance with one's highest clarity that is the nous (intellect), not mere convenience. This clarity, when sustained over time, becomes ethos; it becomes the self in motion.

Thus, the weight of choice is not in its size, but in its direction. Each act steers the soul towards harmony or dissonance with its higher nature.

From the highest ontological view, all things come from To Ena. But what does it mean to choose in relation to To Ena?

To choose in the light of To Ena is to remember unity. To act from the awareness that our being is not separate. That each decision reverberates, not just within a single life, but within the field of all lives. The self is a node in the greater net of being.

To choose selfishly is to forget this unity. To choose with virtue and humility is to remember it. Our virtues are personified by our good deeds and judgement.

To Ena does not force morality; it does not judge. It is reflected more clearly in those actions that express harmony, truth and inner stillness. In this sense, to choose the Meletic path is to reveal To Ena in the form that gives order to the field of becoming.

By cultivating stillness, we elevate consciousness. In the Meletic path, meditation is not escape, but return. It is through quietude that one learns to hear the real causes stirring within.

By developing discernment, we achieve perception. Not every desire is a guide. Not every impulse is wisdom. One must learn the gentle tone of the inner voice that speaks from truth.

By practicing ethical justice, we build our character. Before acting, one may ask the question, is this in harmony with the Meletic virtues I seek? Such as temperance, fortitude, humility or clarity.

By embracing imperfection, we accept our mortality. No choice will be free of all condition. But to choose with attention, to learn, to adjust and to choose again, allows us to explore the path of awakening.

We are not only choosers, we are becoming through choice. Each decision is a thread in the tapestry of the soul. Whether tangled or aligned, the pattern forms.

We should act not with fear, nor with pride, but with awareness. We should carry the weight of choice not as a burden, but as a sacred offering that is light enough to lift, heavy enough to matter.

In this act, moment by moment, the genuine soul reveals itself. Through it, the logos finds order and the nous form. To Ena is not a mere path of choice; it is enlightenment.

Recommend Write a ReviewReport

Share Tweet Pin Reddit
About The Author
Franc68
Lorient Montaner
About This Story
Audience
All
Posted
15 May, 2025
Words
1,303
Read Time
6 mins
Rating
No reviews yet
Views
140

Please login or register to report this story.

More Stories

Please login or register to review this story.